Why Institutions See Bitcoin as Digital Gold
Ryan Rasmussen, head of research at Bitwise, reveals that sovereign wealth funds and major institutions are increasingly viewing Bitcoin as a reserve asset comparable to gold, despite recent price volatility.
Breaking news
Spiral Integrates Bitcoin Payments into Mesh LLM for Machine-to-Machine AI Compute Trading
Strike Introduces Stacks to Organize Bitcoin Savings Into Custom Buckets
CFTC Chair Announces New Crypto Rulemaking to Prevent FTX-Style Collapse
Binance Expands Margin Collateral Options with New Equity-Linked TokensWhen Bitcoin dropped from $125,000 to $60,000, none of the 15 major institutions interviewed by Bitwise sold their holdings, and many increased their positions. Rasmussen explained that these institutions—including pension funds, endowments, foundations, and sovereign wealth funds—are treating Bitcoin not as a speculative asset but as a long-term store of value, similar to how they approach gold. The firm’s first institutional crypto adoption report highlights a growing conviction among these entities that Bitcoin offers diversification benefits and hedge properties against currency devaluation and inflation.
How Are Sovereign Funds Balancing Risk and Exposure?
Rasmussen emphasized that the decision to hold or buy Bitcoin during the downturn was driven by a belief in its scarcity, decentralization, and resistance to sovereign control. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin operates outside any single government’s influence, making it appealing to sovereign wealth funds seeking to reduce reliance on the U. S. dollar or other fiat currencies. The report notes that several institutions have begun allocating small but meaningful portions of their portfolios to Bitcoin, often alongside gold, as part of a broader strategy to preserve capital over decades. This shift reflects a maturing perception of Bitcoin from a tech experiment to a legitimate macro asset.
While institutions are increasing their Bitcoin exposure, they remain cautious about volatility and regulatory uncertainty. Rasmussen noted that most are using dollar-cost averaging and strict risk limits, typically allocating less than 5% of total assets to crypto. They also prioritize secure custody solutions and regulatory compliance, often working with regulated custodians and auditors to meet fiduciary standards. Despite these safeguards, the report found that confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term viability is growing, particularly among funds with multi-decade investment horizons that can withstand short-term price swings.
What percentage of institutional portfolios are allocated to Bitcoin? Most institutions allocate less than 5% of their total assets to Bitcoin, using cautious, gradual investment strategies to manage risk while gaining exposure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are sovereign wealth funds buying Bitcoin directly or through derivatives? The institutions interviewed primarily hold Bitcoin directly through regulated custodians, though some use approved derivatives for exposure where direct ownership faces legal or operational constraints.
How does Bitcoin’s role compare to gold in institutional portfolios? Institutions view Bitcoin as a complementary asset to gold, valuing both for scarcity and independence from government control, but see Bitcoin as offering additional diversification due to its digital nature and programmable properties.
